Examples of Policy Against Harassment Violations and Resulting Sanctions (structured data instances)
To help the community better understand and potentially codify the types of behaviors that violate the Policy Against Harassment at ACM Activities, https://www.acm.org/about-acm/policy-against-harassment this section first presents the general structures of (a) behaviors that violate the Code and (b) sanctions that are imposed on those who engaged in these behaviors. It then uses these structures to present in a uniformly organized way the data that corresponds exactly to the same actual instances of violations and associated sanctions presented in the previous section.
A. General Structure
A Policy Against Harassment violation can typically be described with sentences that follow something like the structure below, with some parts being optional:
WHO did WHAT ACTION to WHOM at WHERE during WHEN
Table H3 below explains the semantics of each part:
Table H3. Semantcs of the Key Elements of Harassment Policy Violations
Harassment Policy Violation | |
---|---|
Information of interest | Explanation |
WHO | respondent |
WHAT ACTION | action violating policy |
ACTION SPECIFICS | features of action in violation |
WHOM | victim(s) / complainant(s) |
WHEN | timeframe of violation |
WHERE | location / event of violation |
Correspondingly, the sanctions imposed as a result of a policy violation can typically be described with sentences that follow the structure below, again with some parts being optional:
WHO must do/not do WHAT SANCTION to WHOM at WHERE for WHEN
Table H4 below explains the semantics of each part:
Table H4. Semantics of the Key Elemenets of Sanctions for Harassment Policy Violations.
Harassment Policy Violation Sanction | |
---|---|
Information of interest | Explanation |
WHO | respondent |
WHAT SANCTION | obligation or prohibition |
SANCTION SPECIFICS | features of obligation or prohibition |
WHOM | complainant(s) / victim(s) |
WHEN | duration of sanction |
WHERE | location / event of sanction |
B. Example Instances
Following the above structures, Table H5 below provides in a uniform fashion the same information as Table H2, i.e., some examples of reported behaviors that violated the Harassment Policy and have resulted in sanctions being imposed on those who engaged in these behaviors.
Table H5. Policy Against Harassment Violation Exemplars.
Example Harassment Policy Violation #1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Violation | Sanctions | |||
WHO | ||||
WHAT | discriminatory comment | WHAT | apologize | demonstrate an understanding |
SPECIFICS |
religion |
SPECIFICS |
discriminatory nature of comment | |
WHOM | WHOM | complainant | ||
WHEN | presentation | WHEN | ||
WHERE | ACM conference | WHERE | ||
Example Harassment Policy Violation #2 | ||||
Violation | Sanctions | |||
WHO | senior scholar | |||
WHAT | flirting | WHAT | complete approved course | |
SPECIFICS |
SPECIFICS |
creating work environments supporting women and other groups marginalized in computing | ||
WHOM | women attendees | WHOM | ||
WHEN | after drinks | WHEN | ||
WHERE | ACM conference | WHERE | ||
Example Harassment Policy Violation #3 | ||||
Violation | Sanctions | |||
WHO | senior scholar | |||
WHAT | unwanted conversations | WHAT | banned | complete approved course |
SPECIFICS |
SPECIFICS |
harassment | ||
WHOM | attendee | WHOM | ||
WHEN | during and after | WHEN | 1 year | |
WHERE | ACM conference | WHERE | in-person ACM events | |
Example Harassment Policy Violation #4 | ||||
Violation | Sanctions | |||
WHO | senior scholar | |||
WHAT | unwanted and uninvited contact | WHAT | banned | demonstrate an understanding |
SPECIFICS |
SPECIFICS |
unwanted & uninvited nature of contact | ||
WHOM | attendees | WHOM | ACM CEO and COPE | |
WHEN | networking event | WHEN | 3 years | after 3 years |
WHERE | ACM-sponsored conference | WHERE | in-person or virtual ACM events | |
Example Harassment Policy Violation #5 | ||||
Violation | Sanctions | |||
WHO | senior scholar | |||
WHAT | predatory behaviors while intoxicated | WHAT | banned | complete approved course |
SPECIFICS |
SPECIFICS |
in-person or virtual ACM activities – including holding a volunteer position (elected, appointed …) | harassment | |
WHOM | attendees | WHOM | ||
WHEN | social event | WHEN | 5 years | |
WHERE | ACM-sponsored conference | WHERE |
C. Definitions and Examples of Abstract Terms and Concepts
There are several abstract terms and concepts used above for purposes of anonymity and generality. Below are definitions and/or non-exhaustive lists of concrete examples for them, drawn from several actual instances of Policy Against Harassment violations brought to ACM (some of them possibly but not necessarily related to any of the cases in Tables H2 /H5) as well as from other potential cases.
Table H6. Definition and Examples of Abstract Terms and Concepts.
Concept | Definition | Examples |
---|---|---|
discrimination | Prejudicial discrimination on the basis of age, color, disability, ethnicity, family status, gender identity, labor union membership, military status, nationality, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, or any other inappropriate factor. | comment: “<this group> is so conservative”; “<this group> is the smartest”; “never trust <this group>”; “<this group> is responsible for bad things”; …
action: (not) hiring/promoting /rewarding/criticizing people in <a group>; … |
flirting | behavior that entails usually playful conversation, body language, or physical contact that potentially indicates an (often superficial or casual) romantic or sexual interest | |
unwanted conversations | conversations on topics that are unjustified by respective stature, social relation, or area of work and/or in which the unwilling party has expressed discomfort verbally (directly or indirectly) or through body language, but the other party continues engaging in | inappropriate topics: physical appearance (self and cloths); demographic characteristics as basis for discrimination; politics; personal beliefs; …
verbal direct: “this makes me uncomfortable”; “I don’t want to talk about this now”; … verbal indirect: “Sorry, but I have work to do”; “Sorry, I have another meeting”; … verbal indirect: no initiative; only brief responses; … body language: walking during conversation; increasing distance; looking elsewhere; looking at phone; … |
unwanted and uninvited contacts | (physical) contact that the unwilling party neither initiated nor reciprocated, expressing discomfort verbally (directly or indirectly) or through body language, but the other party continues engaging in | inappropriate contacts: touching any body part except in handshake (in some cultures, not even that); standing very close; cornering against a wall; prolonged staring; …
verbal direct: “this makes me uncomfortable”; “please stop”; “I need some space”; … verbal indirect: “Sorry, but I have work to go”; “Sorry, I have another meeting”; … body language: no initiative; no reciprocation; stepping back; closed body posture; … |
predatory behaviors | actions (perceived to be) inclined or intended to exploit others for personal gain | unwanted and uninvited conversations and contacts (see previous two entries); persistent suggestions for communication unjustified by respective stature, social relation, or area of work; … |
demonstration of (evidence of) understanding | document analyzing the wrongful nature of past conduct; lecture on the same; successful completion of relevant approved course; concrete changes in own work environment; … |
Report on Complaints Regarding Violations of the Policy Against Harassment at ACM Activities
ACM's recently adopted Policy on Complaint Process Disclosure requires that at the end of each calendar year, ACM make publicly available aggregate data summarizing the number of complaints filed, the category of complaints filed, and within each category, the number dismissed without investigation, the number resolved with the complaint not supported, the number resolved with the complaint supported, the number still open, and for those resolved, the range of months from complaint filing to resolution.